test-gaps
Detect missing test coverage and generate test suggestions. Use when the user asks about coverage gaps, untested code, or what tests to write next; also after adding a feature to find what still needs tests.
Profile →npx skills add ruvnet/ruflo --skill test-gaps --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
Find test coverage gaps via CLI: ```bash npx @claude-flow/cli@latest hooks coverage-gaps --format table --limit 20 npx @claude-flow/cli@latest hooks coverage-route --task "add auth tests" npx @claude-flow/cli@latest hooks coverage-suggest --path src/ ``` Or dispatch the testgaps worker via MCP: `mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__hooks_worker-dispatch({ trigger: "testgaps" })` For continuous detection, use `/loop` with the `loop-worker` skill targeting the `testgaps` worker.
npx @claude-flow/cli@latest hooks coverage-gaps --format table --limit 20 npx @claude-flow/cli@latest hooks coverage-route --task "add auth tests" npx @claude-flow/cli@latest hooks coverage-suggest --path src/
What does the test-gaps skill do?
Detect missing test coverage and generate test suggestions. Use when the user asks about coverage gaps, untested code, or what tests to write next; also after adding a feature to find what still needs tests.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add ruvnet/ruflo --skill test-gaps --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From ruvnet/ruflo, a repository with 67,015 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.