Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

tar-writing-style

Use when polishing the prose of a The Accounting Review (TAR) manuscript — front-loading the result, writing for an accounting audience, enforcing Chicago Manual of Style house conventions, the 150-word abstract, and full author anonymization for double-blind review. Polishes prose and style; it does not fix a thin contribution (tar-contribution-framing) or run the submission preflight (tar-submission).

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill tar-writing-style --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 4 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: The-Accounting-Review-Skills/skills/tar-writing-style/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Writing Style & House Conventions (tar-writing-style) ## When to trigger - The intro buries the result; the reader cannot tell the finding by the end of page 2 - The prose is passive, jargon-laden, or written for a generic business audience - References are in APA or a reference-manager default rather than Chicago - The abstract exceeds 150 words or the manuscript leaks author identity - A reviewer says "hard to follow," "what did you find?", or flags style issues ## Write for the accounting reader, result first TAR's audience is accounting researchers, editors, and a minimum of two expert reviewers. The intro should, within the first page or two, state **the question, the setting/identification, the finding, and the contribution** — do not make the reader wait for the result. Use the standard archival structure (introduction, hypothesis/model development, research design, results, conclusion) and keep terminology precise: "discretionary accruals," "abnormal audit fees," "cash effective tax rate," "cost of equity capital" mean specific things — use them exactly. ## TAR house style (verify against the AAA Manuscript Preparation Guide) - **Citations & references:** **The Chicago Ma

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Write for the accounting reader, result first
  3. TAR house style (verify against the AAA Manuscript Preparation Guide)
  4. Anonymization is a writing task, not just a file task
  5. Prose discipline
  6. Checklist
  7. Anti-patterns
  8. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the tar-writing-style skill do?

Use when polishing the prose of a The Accounting Review (TAR) manuscript — front-loading the result, writing for an accounting audience, enforcing Chicago Manual of Style house conventions, the 150-word abstract, and full author anonymization for double-blind review. Polishes prose and style; it does not fix a thin contribution (tar-contribution-framing) or run the submission preflight (tar-submission).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill tar-writing-style --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going