Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

stata-lint

Run static analysis on a Stata .do or .ado file and report style and best-practice issues.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeNOASSERTION
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill stata-lint --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 3
SKILL.md size: 1 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: skills/64-tmonk-mcp-stata/skills/stata-lint/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 3,244
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

The argument is the absolute path to a `.do` or `.ado` file. 1. Call `stata_inspect_data(action="lint", path=<argument>)`. 2. Display the lint results, grouping issues by severity or type: - Line number and issue description for each finding - Common issues: use of `cd`, `preserve`/`restore`, `#delimit`, hardcoded paths, long lines, missing `version` statement 3. For each category of issue found,

More from Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the stata-lint skill do?

Run static analysis on a Stata .do or .ado file and report style and best-practice issues.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill stata-lint --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills, a repository with 3,244 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going