Agent skill · Documentation

ssi-writing-style

当需要按《中国科学:信息科学》(Scientia Sinica Informationis, SSI) 的中文科技写作规范撰写或打磨稿件时调用。覆盖首页弧线(问题→现状不足→贡献→证据→意义)、中英文双语摘要与关键词、标题、量与单位、变量正斜体、图表与公式规范、参考文献著录(GB/T 7714 与否待核实)、中图分类号、基金著录、以及本刊强调的科学价值与创新高度的表达。作为国家级大信息学科综合旗舰,本刊要求中文表达严谨、英文摘要国际可读,与英文姊妹刊 Science China Information Sciences 并行。

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ssi-writing-style --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 3 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Scientia-Sinica-Informationis-Skills/skills/ssi-writing-style/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# 《中国科学:信息科学》中文科技写作规范(Writing Style) 《中国科学:信息科学》(SCIENTIA SINICA Informationis, SSI) 刊载信息科学领域最高水平的**中文** 原创成果,写作既要符合中文科技论文规范,又要在首页把**科学价值与创新高度**讲清楚。本技能给出 从摘要到参考文献的可操作规范。具体格式细节(如是否严格 GB/T 7714、中图分类号是否强制) **以官网当期《投稿须知》为准(待核实)**,此处给出通行做法与本刊已知要求。 ## 一、首页弧线(最高杠杆) 一篇 SSI 论文的摘要 + 引言应完成: 1. **问题**:从业者/学界公认的信息科学难题,开门见山。 2. **现状为何不足**:已有工作的局限,点出空白。 3. **贡献**:以科学主张陈述创新点(新方法/新理论/新系统/新发现)。 4. **证据**:与主张相称的实验或理

More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the ssi-writing-style skill do?

当需要按《中国科学:信息科学》(Scientia Sinica Informationis, SSI) 的中文科技写作规范撰写或打磨稿件时调用。覆盖首页弧线(问题→现状不足→贡献→证据→意义)、中英文双语摘要与关键词、标题、量与单位、变量正斜体、图表与公式规范、参考文献著录(GB/T 7714 与否待核实)、中图分类号、基金著录、以及本刊强调的科学价值与创新高度的表达。作为国家级大信息学科综合旗舰,本刊要求中文表达严谨、英文摘要国际可读,与英文姊妹刊 Science China Information Sciences 并行。

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ssi-writing-style --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going