Agent skill · Content & Marketing

ssc-style

Use when polishing the language and rhetoric of a 《中国社会科学》 (Social Sciences in China) manuscript — replacing policy-report tone and empty-significance phrases with scholarly argument, keeping a grand-but-restrained register, and ensuring paragraph-leading topic sentences. Use after the proposition and argument are settled.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ssc-style --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 2 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Social-Sciences-in-China-Skills/skills/ssc-style/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# 学理文风(ssc-style) ## 触发时机 - 通读后觉得"像政策文件 / 工作汇报 / 教材综述" - 一段里出现 ≥ 2 个"具有重要意义 / 提供新视角" - 文风要么口号化,要么纯技术腔,缺学理质感 ## 目标语域:宏观视野 + 学理克制 既不流于口号与宏大抒情,也不沦为纯技术报告。每个判断都有学理依据,每个大词都能兑现。 ## 对照表(黑名单 → 白名单) | 问题 | 黑名单 | 白名单 | |------|--------|--------| | 空洞价值 | "具有重大的理论价值" | "为理解 X 提供了 Y 框架,修正了 Z 判断" | | 口号化 | "必须高度重视 / 大力推进" | "这一机制表明,制度设计应在 X 处优先于 Y" | | 套话贡献 | "丰富了相关研究" | "提出 <概念>,重排了对 X 的既有认识" | | 炫技 | "本文运用复杂的 XX 方法" | "借助 XX 方法,本文得以分离出 Y 机制" | | 文献堆砌 | "(A,2020;B,2021;C,2022)" | 按源流/进展/位置分述 | | 大词空转 | "推动文明进步" | 落到具体机制与边界,少用不可兑现的大词 | ## 行文规范 - **一段一概括**:每段首句是概括句,审稿人读首句即可复原全文逻辑 - 概念全文一致,慎用未界定的大词 - 谦逊与边界:经验研究说"提供了证据支持",不说"证明了" - 跨学科稿照顾他学科读者:少用本学科黑话或首次出现即解释 ## 自检清单 - [ ] "具有重要意义"类空话命中 = 0 - [ ] 无政策汇报腔("加强/完善/推进/深化"四件套) - [ ] 每段首句为概括句 - [ ] 大词都能兑现为具体机制/边界 - [ ] 方法描述不长于思想阐释 ## 学理改写顺序 不要先做句子润色,先做段落功能检查: 1. 标出每段首句,判断它是在提出判断、推进论证,还是只在转述材料。 2. 把"重要意义"类句子改成"本文改变了对 X 的哪一层理解"。 3. 把政策建议句改成机制句:先说为什么,再说在何种条件下可能怎么办。 4. 把方法句压到服务论证的位置:方法只说明如何看见机制,不替代理论发现。 5. 通读标题、小标题、摘要、结论,确保核心概念命名一致。 这一顺序能避免把一篇政策报告只改成更漂亮的政策报告。目标是让文字承载理论命题。 ## 学科语域的校准 本刊各学科文章语域不同,但共享"学理克制"的底色。改稿前先认领学科语域,再做句子手术: - 哲学/思想史稿:允许长句与概念密度,但每个术语须有出处或界定,忌散文化抒情 - 经济学/定量稿:忌翻译腔与符号堆砌,结果句要还原为关于社会过程的中文判断 - 法学稿:规范分析语言务求精确,忌把论证写成普法宣传 - 史学稿:叙事可以从容,但每段叙事都须服务论题,忌为细

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. 触发时机
  2. 目标语域:宏观视野 + 学理克制
  3. 对照表(黑名单 → 白名单)
  4. 行文规范
  5. 自检清单
  6. 学理改写顺序
  7. 学科语域的校准
  8. 标题与小标题的学理化
  9. 微型改写演练
  10. 反模式
  11. 输出格式
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the ssc-style skill do?

Use when polishing the language and rhetoric of a 《中国社会科学》 (Social Sciences in China) manuscript — replacing policy-report tone and empty-significance phrases with scholarly argument, keeping a grand-but-restrained register, and ensuring paragraph-leading topic sentences. Use after the proposition and argument are settled.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ssc-style --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going