Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

spq-literature-positioning

Use when positioning a Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ) manuscript against the literature so it reads as a contribution to sociological social psychology. SPQ readers expect engagement with the field's own traditions and theoretical programs — symbolic interaction, social structure and personality, group processes, identity, affect — not a generic citation pile or a purely psychological framing. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the lit review.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill spq-literature-positioning --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Social-Psychology-Quarterly-Skills/skills/spq-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Literature Positioning (spq-literature-positioning) An SPQ paper has to land inside a **conversation in sociological social psychology**, not in psychology broadly or in macro sociology. Reviewers are drawn from the field's traditions and theoretical programs; they expect you to engage the right ones. Positioning is where you show the paper belongs at SPQ. ## When to trigger - Drafting or revising the introduction and the "contribution" paragraph - A reviewer said you "missed the relevant social-psychological literature" or framed the paper too psychologically - Your empirical work is solid but it isn't connected to an SPQ-recognized program - You need to distinguish your contribution from the closest prior papers in the field ## How SPQ wants the literature engaged 1. **Engage a program, not a pile of citations.** Place the paper in a recognizable tradition (symbolic interaction, SSP, group processes, identity theory, affect control / expectation states) and the live debate within it. Cite the works that *define* that debate. 2. **Speak as a sociologist of the self.** Frame the contribution around the **structure–individual link**. A purely individual-cognition framing (JPSP/Psy

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. How SPQ wants the literature engaged
  3. Cross-tradition engagement (a distinctive SPQ demand)
  4. Micro-rewrite: off-field vs. SPQ-ready
  5. Anti-patterns
  6. Output format
  7. Supplementary resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the spq-literature-positioning skill do?

Use when positioning a Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ) manuscript against the literature so it reads as a contribution to sociological social psychology. SPQ readers expect engagement with the field's own traditions and theoretical programs — symbolic interaction, social structure and personality, group processes, identity, affect — not a generic citation pile or a purely psychological framing. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the lit review.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill spq-literature-positioning --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going