Agent skill · Content & Marketing

smr-literature-positioning

Use when positioning a Sociological Methods & Research (SMR) manuscript against the methods literature across sociology, statistics, econometrics, psychometrics, and computational social science, and avoiding sibling-journal misattribution. Maps the contribution onto prior methods; does not derive or simulate.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill smr-literature-positioning --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Sociological-Methods-and-Research-Skills/skills/smr-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# SMR Literature Positioning Use this to place the contribution in the *methods* literature, not the substantive one. SMR reviewers are methodologists who often know the closest prior estimator, the original derivation, and the competing approach in a neighboring discipline. A missed precedent is the fastest path to a reject. ## Position against methods, not findings The literature review of an SMR paper answers "what is the closest *method*, and how is yours different?" — not "what is known about the substantive topic." Structure the review as a small map: - **Direct ancestors**: the method(s) your contribution extends, corrects, or replaces. Cite the primary source, not a textbook summary. - **Cross-discipline siblings**: the same problem solved in statistics, econometrics, psychometrics, machine learning, or network science. SMR readers expect you to know that a "new" sociology method may already exist under another name elsewhere. - **Competing methods**: the alternatives a reviewer will demand you beat in simulation. Name them here so the comparison set in `smr-simulation-studies` is not a surprise. ## The precedent audit Run this before drafting the review: - Search the **ori

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Position against methods, not findings
  2. The precedent audit
  3. Cross-field translation table
  4. Sibling-journal misattribution guard
  5. What an SMR reviewer checks first
  6. Checklist
  7. Anti-patterns
  8. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the smr-literature-positioning skill do?

Use when positioning a Sociological Methods & Research (SMR) manuscript against the methods literature across sociology, statistics, econometrics, psychometrics, and computational social science, and avoiding sibling-journal misattribution. Maps the contribution onto prior methods; does not derive or simulate.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill smr-literature-positioning --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going