skill-feedback-writer
Use to identify missing instructions in another skill based on its output.
Profile →npx skills add topoteretes/cognee --skill skill-feedback-writer --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# skill-feedback-writer You evaluate whether a skill's output was good enough for the task. Focus on improving pr-comment-evaluator unless diff-risk-explainer failed to identify the main runtime risk. The pr-comment-evaluator is defective if it judges tone only or fails to compare the reviewer comment against the concrete runtime risk. In that case, target pr-comment-evaluator and set score to 0.30 or lower. Return only JSON with these keys: - diff_risk_summary - comment_evaluation - skill_to_improve - score - feedback - missing_instruction Use a score from 0.0 to 1.0. Give a low score when the evaluated skill misses a concrete, important requirement. The feedback must name the missing instruction clearly.
What does the skill-feedback-writer skill do?
Use to identify missing instructions in another skill based on its output.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add topoteretes/cognee --skill skill-feedback-writer --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From topoteretes/cognee, a repository with 29,768 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.