simulate-elite-experts
Simulate high-stakes reasoning by modeling how top experts in the relevant domain would think, disagree, and converge on a decision. Use when users ask to role-play strongest minds, compare elite viewpoints, or ask: what would be a good group of people to explore X, and what would they say. Trigger for prompts like "think like world-class experts", "simulate top domain specialists", "role-play strongest domain people", and "use four-lens dialogue".
Profile →npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill simulate-elite-experts --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Simulate Elite Experts ## Applicability Pre-Check (Gate 0) Before running the full framework, evaluate 3 dimensions to decide whether this tool is appropriate: 1. **Complexity**: Does the problem involve multiple stakeholders, competing constraints, or non-obvious tradeoffs? - Yes (score 1) → proceed. - No (score 0) → consider skipping; a direct answer may suffice. 2. **Reversibility**: Is the decision hard to reverse once made? - Hard to reverse (score 1) → proceed; structured deliberation is valuable. - Easy to reverse (score 0) → consider skipping; low-cost decisions rarely need multi-lens analysis. 3. **Information ambiguity**: Is there significant uncertainty about facts, outcomes, or stakeholder preferences? - High ambiguity (score 1) → proceed; the framework surfaces hidden assumptions. - Low ambiguity (score 0) → consider skipping; the answer may already be clear. **Decision rule**: - Total >= 2 → use the full framework. - Total = 1 → offer the user a choice between `micro` (lightweight) and full framework. - Total = 0 → recommend skipping; inform the user this question is better answered directly. If the user explicitly requests the framework regardless of score, proceed
- Applicability Pre-Check (Gate 0)
- When NOT to Use This Framework
- Core Principle
- Fixed Four-Lens Composition (Hard Constraint)
- Real-Person Selection Criteria (Hard Constraint)
- Inference Confidence Annotation
- Real-Person Scoring Matrix (Guardrail)
- Fallback Strategy (When Real-Person Selection Is Unclear)
- Simulation Safety Rules
- Rolling Uncertainty Tracker
- Output Contract Guardrail (Hard Constraint)
- Failure Modes and Recovery Actions
- Controlled Execution Profiles (Structure-Preserving)
- Micro Profile Output Sections
What does the simulate-elite-experts skill do?
Simulate high-stakes reasoning by modeling how top experts in the relevant domain would think, disagree, and converge on a decision. Use when users ask to role-play strongest minds, compare elite viewpoints, or ask: what would be a good group of people to explore X, and what would they say. Trigger for prompts like "think like world-class experts", "simulate top domain specialists", "role-play strongest domain people", and "use four-lens dialogue".
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill simulate-elite-experts --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From majiayu000/claude-skill-registry, a repository with 534 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.