Agent skill · Data & Analytics

sigmod-experiments

Use when designing or auditing the evaluation of a SIGMOD paper, covering workload realism and standard benchmark usage, baseline tuning fairness, scalability and tail-latency methodology, ablations that isolate the mechanism, and the setup disclosure a data-systems PC demands before trusting any speedup.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill sigmod-experiments --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: SIGMOD-Skills/skills/sigmod-experiments/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# SIGMOD Experiments The evaluation section decides most SIGMOD verdicts. A data-systems PC does not ask whether your system is fast; it asks whether the experiments would convince the person who built the baseline you beat. Design the evaluation to survive that specific reader. ## The setup table comes first Before any result, the paper owes a complete experimental contract: hardware (CPU, memory, storage class, network), software versions, datasets with scale, workloads with skew and mix parameters, baseline versions and tuning provenance, repetition counts, and warm-up policy. At SIGMOD this is not appendix material — reviewers skim to it before reading the design. ## Workload realism ladder | Rung | Example | Evidentiary weight | |---|---|---| | Microbenchmark | Single-operator stress loop | Explains mechanisms; proves little alone | | Standard benchmark | TPC-style, YCSB-style suites at stated scale | Comparable across papers; known blind spots | | Trace-derived | Public or characterized production traces | High, if provenance is disclosed | | End-to-end application | Full query mix on realistic schema | Highest, rarely achieved | A SIGMOD-strong evaluation climbs the ladder:

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. The setup table comes first
  2. Workload realism ladder
  3. Baseline fairness protocol
  4. Curves, not points
  5. Ablations that isolate the mechanism
  6. Run hygiene
  7. Matching metrics to contribution type
  8. Negative-result honesty
  9. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the sigmod-experiments skill do?

Use when designing or auditing the evaluation of a SIGMOD paper, covering workload realism and standard benchmark usage, baseline tuning fairness, scalability and tail-latency methodology, ablations that isolate the mechanism, and the setup disclosure a data-systems PC demands before trusting any speedup.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill sigmod-experiments --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going