peer-review
Systematic peer review toolkit. Evaluate methodology, statistics, design, reproducibility, ethics, figure integrity, reporting standards, for manuscript and grant review across disciplines.
npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill scientific-thinking-peer-review --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Scientific Critical Evaluation and Peer Review ## Overview Peer review is a systematic process for evaluating scientific manuscripts. Assess methodology, statistics, design, reproducibility, ethics, and reporting standards. Apply this skill for manuscript and grant review across disciplines with constructive, rigorous evaluation. ## When to Use This Skill This skill should be used when: - Conducting peer review of scientific manuscripts for journals - Evaluating grant proposals and research applications - Assessing methodology and experimental design rigor - Reviewing statistical analyses and reporting standards - Evaluating reproducibility and data availability - Checking compliance with reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA) - Providing constructive feedback on scientific writing ## Peer Review Workflow Conduct peer review systematically through the following stages, adapting depth and focus based on the manuscript type and discipline. ### Stage 1: Initial Assessment Begin with a high-level evaluation to determine the manuscript's scope, novelty, and overall quality. **Key Questions:** - What is the central research question or hypothesis? - What are the main findings a
- Overview
- When to Use This Skill
- Peer Review Workflow
- Stage 1: Initial Assessment
- Stage 2: Detailed Section-by-Section Review
- Stage 3: Methodological and Statistical Rigor
- Stage 4: Reproducibility and Transparency
- Stage 5: Figure and Data Presentation
- Stage 6: Ethical Considerations
- Stage 7: Writing Quality and Clarity
- Structuring Peer Review Reports
- Summary Statement
- Major Comments
- Minor Comments
What does the peer-review skill do?
Systematic peer review toolkit. Evaluate methodology, statistics, design, reproducibility, ethics, figure integrity, reporting standards, for manuscript and grant review across disciplines.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill scientific-thinking-peer-review --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From majiayu000/claude-skill-registry, a repository with 534 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.