rss-writing-style
Use when revising an RSS (Robotics: Science and Systems) draft to meet the science-first bar — a falsifiable claim about robotics up front, evidence sized to claim scope, honest failure reporting, concision under an 8-page ceiling that rewards brevity, and prose that pre-answers reviewers because a rebuttal may never come.
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill rss-writing-style --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# RSS Writing Style Revise the manuscript for the venue where "the robot worked" is the beginning of a paper, not its conclusion. RSS expects a scientific claim; the writing's job is to make that claim visible, falsifiable, and already defended. ## The claim-first page By the end of page one, a reader should be able to fill in: - **Claim:** what is asserted about robotics (a mechanism, a property,
What does the rss-writing-style skill do?
Use when revising an RSS (Robotics: Science and Systems) draft to meet the science-first bar — a falsifiable claim about robotics up front, evidence sized to claim scope, honest failure reporting, concision under an 8-page ceiling that rewards brevity, and prose that pre-answers reviewers because a rebuttal may never come.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill rss-writing-style --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.