Agent skill · Design & Presentation

robustness-checks

Use when a main specification has produced a result, when preparing a paper appendix, when a reviewer requests robustness, or before declaring any empirical finding final. Guides selection of design-appropriate checks without mandating a fixed checklist.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeNOASSERTION
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill robustness-checks --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 7 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: skills/60-regisely-superpapers/skills/robustness-checks/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 3,244
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Robustness Checks ## Overview This skill applies canonical robustness checks appropriate to the research design. It is open-ended — the skill suggests checks that fit the specific identification strategy, not a blanket checklist. YAGNI applies aggressively: a paper with 5 well-chosen robustness checks is stronger than one with 30 redundant ones. ## When to Use - After `statistical-modeling` has

More from Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the robustness-checks skill do?

Use when a main specification has produced a result, when preparing a paper appendix, when a reviewer requests robustness, or before declaring any empirical finding final. Guides selection of design-appropriate checks without mandating a fixed checklist.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill robustness-checks --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills, a repository with 3,244 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going