Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

rje-review-process

Use to understand and plan around The RAND Journal of Economics (RJE) review pipeline — the upfront editor screen (possible desk reject), peer review by two anonymous referees, and a final read by the handling Editor. Sets expectations and shapes a submission that clears the first screen.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill rje-review-process --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: RAND-Journal-of-Economics-Skills/skills/rje-review-process/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Review Process (rje-review-process) ## When to trigger - You want to know what happens after you press submit on Wiley Research Exchange - You are deciding how to pitch the cover letter and front-load the contribution - You are gauging desk-reject risk before paying the submission fee ## How RJE review works (verified 2026-06-01) RJE uses an **editor-screened, then two-anonymous-referee** model (source: rje.org/submissions.html): 1. **Editor screen.** Each manuscript is first assigned to an Editor on the Board of Editors who **quickly reviews it and may desk-reject** before any refereeing. The current **Editor-in-Chief is Craig Bond (RAND)**; handling Editors include IO specialists such as Gary Biglaiser, Ying Fan, Alessandro Gavazza, Jean-François Houde, Julian Wright, and Jidong Zhou. Because the front screen is explicit and fast, the **first page of the article and the cover letter must make the IO contribution legible immediately**. 2. **Two anonymous referees.** Manuscripts that survive the screen go to **two referees who are anonymous to authors**. (Whether author identity is concealed from referees — single vs double blind — is **待核实**; do not assume double-blind.) 3. **Ha

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. How RJE review works (verified 2026-06-01)
  3. What clears the screen at the IO flagship
  4. Desk-reject risk table (calibrate before you submit)
  5. Worked vignette: anticipating the screen on an auction paper
  6. Referee and editor expectations once past the screen
  7. Anti-patterns
  8. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the rje-review-process skill do?

Use to understand and plan around The RAND Journal of Economics (RJE) review pipeline — the upfront editor screen (possible desk reject), peer review by two anonymous referees, and a final read by the handling Editor. Sets expectations and shapes a submission that clears the first screen.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill rje-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going