rje-rebuttal
Use when responding to a revise-and-resubmit from The RAND Journal of Economics (RJE) — answering the two anonymous referees and the handling Editor on an industrial-organization manuscript while respecting the hard page caps and RJE house style. Strategy for the response letter; it does not rewrite the article.
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill rje-rebuttal --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# R&R Rebuttal Strategy (rje-rebuttal) ## When to trigger - You received an R&R from the RJE handling Editor with two referee reports - You must reconcile conflicting referee demands without blowing the 50-page cap - You are drafting the point-by-point response letter ## RJE-specific rebuttal posture RJE decisions come from a **handling Editor** synthesizing **two anonymous referees** after an upf
What does the rje-rebuttal skill do?
Use when responding to a revise-and-resubmit from The RAND Journal of Economics (RJE) — answering the two anonymous referees and the handling Editor on an industrial-organization manuscript while respecting the hard page caps and RJE house style. Strategy for the response letter; it does not rewrite the article.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill rje-rebuttal --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.