Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

review-paper

Comprehensive manuscript review covering argument structure, econometric specification, citation completeness, and potential referee objections

majiayu000github.com/majiayu000GitHub ↗
claude-codecan modify filesMIT
Install
npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill review-paper --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 2
SKILL.md size: 4 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Allowed tools: ReadGrepGlobWriteTask
Path: skills/analysis/review-paper/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 534
Language: HTML

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Manuscript Review Produce a thorough, constructive review of an academic manuscript — the kind of report a top-journal referee would write. **Input:** `$ARGUMENTS` — path to a paper (.tex, .pdf, or .qmd), or a filename in `master_supporting_docs/`. --- ## Steps 1. **Locate and read the manuscript.** Check: - Direct path from `$ARGUMENTS` - `master_supporting_docs/supporting_papers/$ARGUMENTS` - Glob for partial matches 2. **Read the full paper** end-to-end. For long PDFs, read in chunks (5 pages at a time). 3. **Evaluate across 6 dimensions** (see below). 4. **Generate 3-5 "referee objections"** — the tough questions a top referee would ask. 5. **Produce the review report.** 6. **Save to** `quality_reports/paper_review_[sanitized_name].md` --- ## Review Dimensions ### 1. Argument Structure - Is the research question clearly stated? - Does the introduction motivate the question effectively? - Is the logical flow sound (question → method → results → conclusion)? - Are the conclusions supported by the evidence? - Are limitations acknowledged? ### 2. Identification Strategy - Is the causal claim credible? - What are the key identifying assumptions? Are they stated explicitly? - Are t

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Steps
  2. Review Dimensions
  3. 1. Argument Structure
  4. 2. Identification Strategy
  5. 3. Econometric Specification
  6. 4. Literature Positioning
  7. 5. Writing Quality
  8. 6. Presentation
  9. Output Format
  10. Principles
Ships with 1 file
  • metadata.json
More from claude-skill-registry
All skills →
About this skill
What does the review-paper skill do?

Comprehensive manuscript review covering argument structure, econometric specification, citation completeness, and potential referee objections

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill review-paper --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From majiayu000/claude-skill-registry, a repository with 534 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going