review-code
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating spec/PRD asked for?). Use when the user wants to review a branch, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".
npx skills add rengwu/wayfinder-maps --skill review-code --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
Two-axis review of the diff between `HEAD` and a fixed point the user supplies: - **Standards** — does the code conform to this repo's documented coding standards? - **Spec** — does the code faithfully implement the originating spec / PRD? The two axes are reviewed **in isolation** so they don't pollute each other, then aggregated side by side. ## Process ### 1. Pin the fixed point Whatever the us
What does the review-code skill do?
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating spec/PRD asked for?). Use when the user wants to review a branch, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add rengwu/wayfinder-maps --skill review-code --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From rengwu/wayfinder-maps, a repository with 86 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.