Agent skill · Documentation

reverse-engineering-texts

Reverse-engineer texts into a reusable structural blueprint (reverse outlining, argument mining, copy teardown). Use when the user asks to analyze a text’s thesis, hook, framework (AIDA/PAS/PASTOR/BAB), argument map, rhetoric (Ethos/Pathos/Logos), or when they want to convert “text → structure/blueprint” to reuse patterns in writing, specs, prompts, or marketing.

majiayu000github.com/majiayu000GitHub ↗
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill reverse-engineering-texts --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 2
SKILL.md size: 11 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: skills/analysis/reverse-engineering-texts/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 534
Language: HTML

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Reverse-Engineering Texts ## Goal Turn a finished text into a **TeardownBlueprint** (a “drawing”) that is reusable: structure, argument moves, and rhetorical patterning. ## Core disciplines (FPF-aligned) - **Strict distinction**: TextArtifact (the text) ≠ Blueprint (your description) ≠ Output (new draft/prompt). - **Evidence first**: Every non-trivial claim in the blueprint must include a short **quote** from the text (an “evidence anchor”). - **Parsimony**: Prefer the simplest structure/framework that explains the whole text. - **Uncertainty**: Mark low-confidence inferences explicitly. ## What “SOTA” means here This skill is not just “label AIDA and call it done”. State-of-the-art reverse-engineering requires: - **Paradigm transparency**: explicitly declare the interpretive lens used (and what would count as an “error” vs a paradigm clash). - **Meaning-in-interaction**: meaning is extracted in a dynamic local context, not “derived from rules given from above”. - **Ambiguity handling**: do not force-collapse; maintain multiple plausible interpretations when needed. - **Order effects awareness**: sometimes A→B ≠ B→A; record when the analysis is non-commutative. ## Method layering

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Goal
  2. Core disciplines (FPF-aligned)
  3. What “SOTA” means here
  4. Method layering
  5. Quick workflow (text → blueprint)
  6. 0) Context-first (always)
  7. 1) Core teardown (default)
  8. 2) Advanced (SOTA extensions)
  9. Output contract
  10. Mandatory execution order (hard requirement)
  11. Template availability check (hard requirement)
  12. Deliverables
  13. Minimum QA checklist
  14. SOTA QA checklist (recommended)
Ships with 1 file
  • metadata.json
More from claude-skill-registry
All skills →
About this skill
What does the reverse-engineering-texts skill do?

Reverse-engineer texts into a reusable structural blueprint (reverse outlining, argument mining, copy teardown). Use when the user asks to analyze a text’s thesis, hook, framework (AIDA/PAS/PASTOR/BAB), argument map, rhetoric (Ethos/Pathos/Logos), or when they want to convert “text → structure/blueprint” to reuse patterns in writing, specs, prompts, or marketing.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill reverse-engineering-texts --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From majiayu000/claude-skill-registry, a repository with 534 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going