revedres-revision
Use when an editor/reviewer decision letter arrives on a Review of Educational Research (RER) review or meta-analysis and you must plan the revision and response. Turns the letter into action and a point-by-point reply; it does not run the submission preflight (revedres-submission) or re-architect the framework from scratch (revedres-organizing-framework).
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-revision --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Revision (revedres-revision) ## When to trigger - An RER decision letter arrived (major/minor revision, or reject-and-resubmit) - You must convert masked reviewer comments into a revision plan and a response letter - Reviewers ask for a wider search, more coding detail, or stronger robustness - You need to decide which requests to adopt and which to push back on, with evidence ## Read the decision the way RER editors mean it RER reviews are refereed against rigor of the synthesis *and* rigor of the review process. Most revision requests fall into recognizable buckets — diagnose each before drafting. | Reviewer request | What it really demands | Skill to revisit | |---|---|---| | "Expand/justify the search" | a more exhaustive or better-documented search; updated PRISMA | `revedres-literature-synthesis` | | "This reads as a summary" | a stronger, more reconciling organizing framework | `revedres-organizing-framework` | | "Address heterogeneity / bias" | I², moderators, funnel/Egger, sensitivity analyses | `revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance` | | "Coding reliability unclear" | reported κ/ICC and a shared codebook | `revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility` | | "You vote-count
- When to trigger
- Read the decision the way RER editors mean it
- How to revise so the second round is clean
- Drafting the response letter
- Checklist
- Anti-patterns
- Output format
What does the revedres-revision skill do?
Use when an editor/reviewer decision letter arrives on a Review of Educational Research (RER) review or meta-analysis and you must plan the revision and response. Turns the letter into action and a point-by-point reply; it does not run the submission preflight (revedres-submission) or re-architect the framework from scratch (revedres-organizing-framework).
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-revision --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.