revedres-organizing-framework
Use when turning a screened, coded corpus into an analytic spine that advances theory or policy for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript. Builds the conceptual contribution beyond a tally; it does not run the search (revedres-literature-synthesis) or appraise robustness/risk-of-bias (revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance).
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-organizing-framework --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Organizing Framework (revedres-organizing-framework) ## When to trigger - The corpus is complete and coded, but the draft reads as study-after-study - You can describe what each study found but not what the field, taken together, means - A reviewer is likely to say "this is a competent summary, but what is the contribution?" - You need section architecture and cannot decide how to carve the literature ## The RER contribution is the framework, not the tally The cardinal RER failure mode is the **annotated bibliography**: a competent, even exhaustive, study-by-study summary with no argument about the field. RER wants a **comprehensive, critical, integrative** review — *integrative* means the studies are reorganized under a frame that the reader could not have built from the abstracts alone, and that **advances theory or policy**. A meta-analysis is not exempt: a pooled number with no conceptual account of *why* effects vary is a calculation, not a synthesis. A good framework is the lens through which scattered findings become a coherent claim. Candidate spines: | Spine type | When it fits | Example shape | |---|---|---| | **Taxonomy / typology** | many studies, no shared map | clas
- When to trigger
- The RER contribution is the framework, not the tally
- Three tests a framework must pass
- Building the frame from the coded corpus (not before it)
- Checklist
- Anti-patterns
- Output format
What does the revedres-organizing-framework skill do?
Use when turning a screened, coded corpus into an analytic spine that advances theory or policy for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript. Builds the conceptual contribution beyond a tally; it does not run the search (revedres-literature-synthesis) or appraise robustness/risk-of-bias (revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance).
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-organizing-framework --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.