revedres-editor-strategy
Use when anticipating editor and reviewer expectations, framing the contribution, and positioning scope for a Review of Educational Research (RER) submission. Aligns the review with how RER is refereed; it does not run the submission preflight (revedres-submission) or draft the response to reviewers (revedres-revision).
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-editor-strategy --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Editor & Reviewer Strategy (revedres-editor-strategy) ## When to trigger - The review is drafted and you need to see it as RER's editors and reviewers will - You are unsure whether the contribution will read as "advance" or "competent summary" - You want to pre-empt the predictable reviewer objections before they are written - You are weighing RER against a sibling venue and need the fit call ## How RER is refereed (and what that means for you) RER reviews are **submitted and peer-reviewed by AERA/SAGE** — there is no commissioning editor pre-clearing your topic, so the manuscript must win on its own. The co-editors (the most-recent-listed team based at Penn State — Boveda, Ford, Frankenberg, López; publicized as the 2022–2025 team, with no 2026+ successor team announced as of 2026-06-23 web search; 检索于 2026-06-23，以官网为准) desk-screen for fit and rigor before assigning masked reviewers. Two questions decide the manuscript: 1. **Is it genuinely integrative and advancing?** RER explicitly does not want annotated bibliographies or thin stock-takes. Reviewers ask: does the framework reorganize the field and move theory or policy? 2. **Is the review itself rigorous?** For systematic rev
- When to trigger
- How RER is refereed (and what that means for you)
- The predictable reviewer objections (pre-empt each)
- Scope and contribution framing
- Sibling-venue fit (route honestly)
- Checklist
- Anti-patterns
- Output format
What does the revedres-editor-strategy skill do?
Use when anticipating editor and reviewer expectations, framing the contribution, and positioning scope for a Review of Educational Research (RER) submission. Aligns the review with how RER is refereed; it does not run the submission preflight (revedres-submission) or draft the response to reviewers (revedres-revision).
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-editor-strategy --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.