Agent skill · Data & Analytics

revacc-rebuttal

Use when a Review of Accounting Studies (RAST) revise-and-resubmit has arrived and you must plan the revision and draft the point-by-point response — resolving the editor's first-order concerns (identification, the channel, measurement, or the model) before writing the letter. Plans and drafts the response; it does not run the new analyses from scratch (revacc-data-analysis) or re-run the submission preflight (revacc-submission).

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revacc-rebuttal --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Review-of-Accounting-Studies-Skills/skills/revacc-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# R&R Revision & Response (revacc-rebuttal) ## When to trigger - You received a RAST **revise-and-resubmit** and must plan the revision - You need to draft the point-by-point response to the editor and referees - Referees disagree and you must triage which concerns are binding - New analyses change tables and the manuscript needs re-aligning - An analytical paper's referee disputes an assumption or a proposition ## An R&R at RAST is a strong signal — treat it accordingly Because RAST often decides on the first round, an R&R is a meaningful vote of confidence rather than routine. That raises the stakes on getting the revision right: you may not get a third round, so resolve the **editor's first-order concerns substantively**, not rhetorically. Do the analytical (or modeling) work **before** drafting the letter — a RAST R&R turns on whether you have actually strengthened **identification, the economic channel, construct measurement, or the model**, not on rhetorical skill. ## Triage the referee points - **First-order (must resolve):** endogeneity/identification threats, an unidentified channel, fragile or invalid construct measurement, sample-construction concerns; for analytical pap

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. An R&R at RAST is a strong signal — treat it accordingly
  3. Triage the referee points
  4. Draft the response letter
  5. Keep the manuscript consistent and anonymized
  6. Checklist
  7. Anti-patterns
  8. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the revacc-rebuttal skill do?

Use when a Review of Accounting Studies (RAST) revise-and-resubmit has arrived and you must plan the revision and draft the point-by-point response — resolving the editor's first-order concerns (identification, the channel, measurement, or the model) before writing the letter. Plans and drafts the response; it does not run the new analyses from scratch (revacc-data-analysis) or re-run the submission preflight (revacc-submission).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revacc-rebuttal --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going