Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

restat-rebuttal

Use when a The Review of Economics and Statistics (REStat) decision letter (R&R or reject-and-resubmit) has arrived and the manuscript needs a response-to-referees letter and a revision plan. Drafts the response strategy; it does not run new analysis (route that to the analysis skills).

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill restat-rebuttal --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Review-of-Economics-and-Statistics-Skills/skills/restat-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Rebuttal & Response Letter (restat-rebuttal) ## When to trigger - A REStat R&R (or a reject with encouragement) arrived and you must respond - You need to triage referee comments into changes, pushbacks, and concessions - The response letter needs structure before you write a word of revision - Referees disagree with each other and you must navigate conflicting demands ## The REStat rebuttal mindset A REStat revision is judged on whether you **took the identification and measurement concerns seriously and resolved them with evidence**, not rhetoric. The editor is an applied economist arbitrating between referees; your letter must make their job easy: **every comment quoted, addressed, and pointed to the exact change** (page/table/figure). Treat the toughest **identification / measurement** objection as the centerpiece — that is what gets papers rejected at REStat, and resolving it convincingly is what gets them accepted. Concede gracefully where the referee is right; push back **with evidence, never tone** where they are wrong. ## Response-letter structure 1. **Opening:** thank the editor and referees; summarize the 2–4 substantive changes in a short paragraph the editor can skim

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. The REStat rebuttal mindset
  3. Response-letter structure
  4. Triage table
  5. Checklist
  6. Anti-patterns
  7. Worked vignette: resolving the centerpiece objection (illustrative)
  8. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the restat-rebuttal skill do?

Use when a The Review of Economics and Statistics (REStat) decision letter (R&R or reject-and-resubmit) has arrived and the manuscript needs a response-to-referees letter and a revision plan. Drafts the response strategy; it does not run new analysis (route that to the analysis skills).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill restat-rebuttal --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going