Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

restat-literature-positioning

Use when the marginal contribution of a The Review of Economics and Statistics (REStat) manuscript against the closest prior work is fuzzy, generic, or oversold. Stakes the contribution precisely; it does not run analysis or write the full literature review.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill restat-literature-positioning --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Review-of-Economics-and-Statistics-Skills/skills/restat-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Literature Positioning (restat-literature-positioning) ## When to trigger - The intro's "we contribute to several literatures" reads as a citation dump - A referee could ask "how is this different from [obvious prior paper]?" and you lack a one-line answer - The contribution is stated as a topic ("we study X") rather than a delta against named work - You are unsure whether your measurement / identification advance is genuinely new ## The REStat positioning bar REStat referees are applied economists who **know the closest five papers cold**. Positioning must be a **precise delta against named work**, not a tour of a literature. Because REStat prizes **measurement and credible identification**, the most persuasive deltas are of two kinds: (1) **identification delta** — your design credibly estimates a parameter prior work could only correlate or estimate under weaker assumptions; (2) **measurement delta** — you measure the object better (new data, less error, a validated index) and that *changes an applied conclusion*. "First to study" is rarely the contribution; "first to credibly identify / cleanly measure, and it overturns/sharpens [conclusion]" is. ## How to stake the contribut

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. The REStat positioning bar
  3. How to stake the contribution
  4. Positioning patterns that land at REStat
  5. Checklist
  6. Anti-patterns
  7. Worked vignette: turning a tour into a delta (illustrative)
  8. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the restat-literature-positioning skill do?

Use when the marginal contribution of a The Review of Economics and Statistics (REStat) manuscript against the closest prior work is fuzzy, generic, or oversold. Stakes the contribution precisely; it does not run analysis or write the full literature review.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill restat-literature-positioning --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going