Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

research-review

Get a deep critical review of research from GPT using a secondary Codex agent. Use when user says \"review my research\", \"help me review\", \"get external review\", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.

majiayu000github.com/majiayu000GitHub ↗
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill research-review-wanshuiyin-auto-claude-code-res --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 2
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: skills/analysis/research-review-wanshuiyin-auto-claude-code-res/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 534
Language: HTML

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Research Review via a secondary Codex agent (xhigh reasoning) Get a multi-round critical review of research work from an external LLM with maximum reasoning depth. ## Constants - REVIEWER_MODEL = `gpt-5.5` — Model used via a secondary Codex agent. Must be an OpenAI model (e.g., `gpt-5.5`, `o3`, `gpt-4o`) - **REVIEWER_BACKEND = `codex`** — Default: Codex xhigh reviewer. Use `--reviewer: oracle-pro` only when explicitly requested; if Oracle is unavailable, warn and fall back to Codex xhigh. ## Context: $ARGUMENTS ## Prerequisites - Use `spawn_agent` and `send_input` when the user has explicitly allowed delegation or subagents. - If delegation is not allowed, run the same review loop locally and preserve the same deliverable structure. ## Workflow ### Step 1: Gather Research Context Before calling the external reviewer, compile a comprehensive briefing: 1. Read project narrative documents (e.g., STORY.md, README.md, paper drafts) 2. Read any memory/notes files for key findings and experiment history 3. Identify: core claims, methodology, key results, known weaknesses ### Step 2: Initial Review (Round 1) Send a detailed prompt with xhigh reasoning: ``` spawn_agent: reasoning_effort:

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Constants
  2. Context: $ARGUMENTS
  3. Prerequisites
  4. Workflow
  5. Step 1: Gather Research Context
  6. Step 2: Initial Review (Round 1)
  7. Step 3: Iterative Dialogue (Rounds 2-N)
  8. Step 4: Convergence
  9. Step 5: Document Everything
  10. Step 6: Review Tracing
  11. Key Rules
  12. Prompt Templates
  13. For initial review:
  14. For experiment design:
Ships with 1 file
  • metadata.json
More from claude-skill-registry
All skills →
About this skill
What does the research-review skill do?

Get a deep critical review of research from GPT using a secondary Codex agent. Use when user says \"review my research\", \"help me review\", \"get external review\", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill research-review-wanshuiyin-auto-claude-code-res --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From majiayu000/claude-skill-registry, a repository with 534 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going