Agent skill · Backend & API

research-review

Get a deep critical review of research from an external reviewer backend (Codex or manual). Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.

majiayu000github.com/majiayu000GitHub ↗
claude-codecan modify filesMIT
Install
npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill research-review --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 2
SKILL.md size: 7 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Allowed tools: Bash(*)ReadGrepGlobWriteEditmcp__codex__codexmcp__codex__codex-replymcp__manual_review__reviewmcp__manual_review__review_reply
Path: skills/analysis/research-review/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 534
Language: HTML

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Research Review via External Reviewer Backend (xhigh reasoning) > 🔒 **Do not wrap this skill in `/loop`, `/schedule`, or `CronCreate`.** It is > verdict-bearing — it produces a cross-model review verdict, multi-round with > reviewer thread continuity. An external timer re-fires the verdict on > wall-clock time and breaks the reviewer's round-to-round memory: zero new > signal, full token cost. Schedule the *external wait that precedes it* (work > ready → then review once), not the verdict. See > [`shared-references/external-cadence.md`](../shared-references/external-cadence.md). Get a multi-round critical review of research work from the selected external reviewer backend with maximum reasoning depth. ## Constants - REVIEWER_MODEL = `gpt-5.5` — Default model for the Codex backend. Must be an OpenAI model (e.g., `gpt-5.5`, `o3`, `gpt-4o`). Manual backend uses whatever model the user chooses. - **REVIEWER_BACKEND = `codex`** — Default: Codex MCP (xhigh). Override with `— reviewer: oracle-pro` for Oracle MCP, or `— reviewer: manual` for Manual Review MCP. If manual-review MCP is unavailable, stop and print the install command; do not fall back to Codex. See `shared-references/revie

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Constants
  2. Reviewer Calling Convention
  3. Context: $ARGUMENTS
  4. Prerequisites
  5. Workflow
  6. Step 1: Gather Research Context
  7. Step 2: Initial Review (Round 1)
  8. Step 3: Iterative Dialogue (Rounds 2-N)
  9. Step 4: Convergence
  10. Step 5: Document Everything
  11. Key Rules
  12. Prompt Templates
  13. For initial review:
  14. For experiment design:
Ships with 1 file
  • metadata.json
Commands it runs
claude mcp add codex -s user -- codex mcp-server
More from claude-skill-registry
All skills →
About this skill
What does the research-review skill do?

Get a deep critical review of research from an external reviewer backend (Codex or manual). Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill research-review --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From majiayu000/claude-skill-registry, a repository with 534 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going