regulatory-fdi-restructuring-starug

What it does

Identifies and analyzes Regulatory, FDI and Fusionskontrolle aspects within a corporate-law context. It directs the agent to separate role, deadline, responsibility, and evidentiary outputs, and to produce a Fristen- und Risikoampel with Sofortschritten. It emphasizes working along a concrete examination path and delivering outputs like Memo, CP-Tracker, and Closing-CP-Liste, tied to specific norms and procedural steps.

How it works

• It fixes corporate context: determines company, form, organ role, purpose, decision status, and target recipients; if missing, prompts a single clarifying question.
• It inventories sources: lists documents with date, version, source, register/document IDs, and confidentiality marks; marks uploads as [Mandant], registers as [Register], primary sources as [Primärquelle], and model knowledge as [Modellwissen - prüfen].
• It separates organizational levels (management, shareholders, supervisory boards, notaries, registrar).
• It sets a materiality threshold via an Amber/Green/Red framework, with escalation if necessary.
• It performs norms review across listed corporate groups (competence, form, mandate, registration, power, and liability).
• It builds a chain of evidence: every substantive statement must have a source, document, and pinpoint reference; if not accessible, mark [zu verifizieren].
• It creates a risk matrix item per point with fields like facts, legal question, norm, subsumption, risk lamp, legal consequence, recommended action, owner, and deadline.
• It chooses a Draft or Review-Gate based on sufficiency; otherwise it outputs a information-request or a partner/organ template.
• It preps hand-off outputs (e.g., Beschlussentwurf, Board Paper, CP-Tracker) and references the next skill.
• It enforces quality checks to avoid uncaptured case numbers, blind citations, or external communications.

When to use it

Typische Auslöser include phrases indicating need for a robust next step in Regulatory, FDI and merger control, guidance for corporate governance perspectives, or preparation of board/mandant-facing documents. It instructs to avoid starting outputs prematurely if the mandate context or facts are incomplete.

What it can touch

• It prescribes sourcing and documenting norms, decisions, and procedural steps and requires maintaining a source chain; it marks items with tags like [Mandant], [Register], [BGH-Datenbank], [dejure.org], [EUR-Lex], or [Web-Recherche - prüfen].

Caveats

• It relies on live or file-based sources; incorrect or unavailable sources are flagged as [zu verifizieren].
• It does not replace substantive legal decisions by partners or mandants, nor automate external communications.
• It avoids unaudited model knowledge citations and requires citation to court decisions with date, citation, and link per allowed sources.