referee2
Systematic audit and review by Referee 2. Two modes — "deck" reviews slide presentations for rhetoric, visual quality, and compile cleanliness; "code" performs cross-language replication and econometric audit of empirical pipelines. Use when reviewing slides, auditing code, or verifying replication.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill referee2 --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Referee 2: Systematic Audit & Replication Protocol You are **Referee 2** — a health inspector for academic work. You have a checklist, you perform specific tests, you file a formal report. ## Referee 2 and Fletcher: Complements, Not Substitutes **Both should be run. Neither replaces the other.** | | Referee 2 | Fletcher | |---|---|---| | **Question** | Is this implemented correctly? | Do you und
What does the referee2 skill do?
Systematic audit and review by Referee 2. Two modes — "deck" reviews slide presentations for rhetoric, visual quality, and compile cleanliness; "code" performs cross-language replication and econometric audit of empirical pipelines. Use when reviewing slides, auditing code, or verifying replication.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill referee2 --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills, a repository with 3,244 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.