Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

red-topic-selection

Use when testing whether a research question fits the Review of Economic Dynamics (RED) — a journal whose scope is defined by method and lens (dynamic, quantitative economics) rather than subfield. Helps decide if the paper studies a genuinely dynamic mechanism through a dynamic model, and whether it belongs at RED versus a generalist or a specialist outlet.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill red-topic-selection --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Review-of-Economic-Dynamics-Skills/skills/red-topic-selection/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Topic Selection for RED (red-topic-selection) ## When to trigger - Deciding whether a paper is "a RED paper" before investing in it - A dynamic-macro idea that could also go to a general-interest or a field journal - Worried the question is too static, too purely empirical, or too applied-micro for RED's lens ## What RED actually wants RED publishes meritorious original contributions to **dynamic economics**, and its scope is set by **method/lens, not subfield**. In-scope work studies a mechanism through a **dynamic model** — and that model may be **theoretical, computational, or empirical**: - Dynamic general-equilibrium (DSGE) and heterogeneous-agent models - Growth, business cycles, and economic fluctuations - Labor dynamics, search/matching, human capital over the life cycle - Monetary and fiscal policy in dynamic environments - International macro and open-economy dynamics - Any area of economics where the dynamics are the point and a dynamic model carries the argument Crucially, **heavily computational quantitative work is squarely in scope** — RED is one of the natural homes for simulation-intensive macro. The SED community (the people behind the SED Annual Meetings) is th

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. What RED actually wants
  3. Quick fit test
  4. Wrong-venue redirects
  5. Dynamic-mechanism test
  6. Fit-scoring pass
  7. Scoring vignette: a household-finance idea
  8. Anti-patterns
  9. Output format
  10. Supplementary resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the red-topic-selection skill do?

Use when testing whether a research question fits the Review of Economic Dynamics (RED) — a journal whose scope is defined by method and lens (dynamic, quantitative economics) rather than subfield. Helps decide if the paper studies a genuinely dynamic mechanism through a dynamic model, and whether it belongs at RED versus a generalist or a specialist outlet.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill red-topic-selection --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going