Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

receiving-code-review

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

FreedomIntelligencegithub.com/FreedomIntelligenceGitHub ↗
claude-code
Install
npx skills add FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills --skill receiving-code-review --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: skills/receiving-code-review/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 2,909
Language: Python
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Code Review Reception ## Overview Code review requires technical evaluation, not emotional performance. **Core principle:** Verify before implementing. Ask before assuming. Technical correctness over social comfort. ## The Response Pattern ``` WHEN receiving code review feedback: 1. READ: Complete feedback without reacting 2. UNDERSTAND: Restate requirement in own words (or ask) 3. VERIFY: Check against codebase reality 4. EVALUATE: Technically sound for THIS codebase? 5. RESPOND: Technical acknowledgment or reasoned pushback 6. IMPLEMENT: One item at a time, test each ``` ## Forbidden Responses **NEVER:** - "You're absolutely right!" (explicit CLAUDE.md violation) - "Great point!" / "Excellent feedback!" (performative) - "Let me implement that now" (before verification) **INSTEAD:** - Restate the technical requirement - Ask clarifying questions - Push back with technical reasoning if wrong - Just start working (actions > words) ## Handling Unclear Feedback ``` IF any item is unclear: STOP - do not implement anything yet ASK for clarification on unclear items WHY: Items may be related. Partial understanding = wrong implementation. ``` **Example:** ``` your human partner: "Fix 1-6

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Overview
  2. The Response Pattern
  3. Forbidden Responses
  4. Handling Unclear Feedback
  5. Source-Specific Handling
  6. From your human partner
  7. From External Reviewers
  8. YAGNI Check for "Professional" Features
  9. Implementation Order
  10. When To Push Back
  11. Acknowledging Correct Feedback
  12. Gracefully Correcting Your Pushback
  13. Common Mistakes
  14. Real Examples
More from OpenClaw-Medical-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the receiving-code-review skill do?

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills --skill receiving-code-review --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills, a repository with 2,909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going