qje-writing-style
Use when polishing prose, abstract, and introduction for a Quarterly Journal of Economics (QJE) manuscript so the big idea lands fast for a general-interest reader. Reflects QJE's house style — long, ambitious, narrative-driven empirical papers. Polishes exposition; it does not change results or design.
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill qje-writing-style --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Writing Style (qje-writing-style) ## When to trigger - The prose buries the idea; a reader cannot find the contribution quickly - The abstract does not state the finding, or leads with method - The introduction wanders before reaching the question and the result - Sentences are technical-jargon-dense for a general-interest audience ## QJE house style: ambitious, narrative, long QJE is read acros
What does the qje-writing-style skill do?
Use when polishing prose, abstract, and introduction for a Quarterly Journal of Economics (QJE) manuscript so the big idea lands fast for a general-interest reader. Reflects QJE's house style — long, ambitious, narrative-driven empirical papers. Polishes exposition; it does not change results or design.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill qje-writing-style --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.