Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

psychrev-literature-positioning

Use when locating a Psychological Review manuscript within its theoretical conversation — naming the theories it extends and, above all, the rival models it must beat or subsume. Positions the theory; it does NOT build the model (psychrev-theory-construction) or run the head-to-head prediction contrast (psychrev-argument-development).

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill psychrev-literature-positioning --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 4 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Psychological-Review-Skills/skills/psychrev-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Literature Positioning (psychrev-literature-positioning) ## When to trigger - The model is forming but you cannot name whose account you improve on - Reviewers (you anticipate) will ask "how is this different from [established model]?" - Your introduction cites broadly but engages no specific theory - You are unsure whether your idea is new or a re-derivation of a known model ## The core move: name the rivals, not just the topic At Psychological Review the central positioning question is not "what is the area?" but "**which existing theories make claims about this explanandum, and what does yours do that they cannot?**" Editors and reviewers are typically drawn from exactly the modeling tradition you enter. A paper that does not engage the standing models reads as unaware of its own field. For each phenomenon in your explanandum, build a **rival map**: | Phenomenon (diagnostic) | Rival theory/model | What it predicts | Where it fails / is silent | Your account | |-------------------------|--------------------|------------------|----------------------------|--------------| The most persuasive Review papers select **diagnostic phenomena** — cases where rivals make *different* predi

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. The core move: name the rivals, not just the topic
  3. Three positioning stances (pick the honest one)
  4. Reading the conversation honestly
  5. Checklist
  6. Anti-patterns
  7. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the psychrev-literature-positioning skill do?

Use when locating a Psychological Review manuscript within its theoretical conversation — naming the theories it extends and, above all, the rival models it must beat or subsume. Positions the theory; it does NOT build the model (psychrev-theory-construction) or run the head-to-head prediction contrast (psychrev-argument-development).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill psychrev-literature-positioning --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going