Agent skill · Documentation

psychbull-rebuttal

Use when writing the response to a Psychological Bulletin revise-and-resubmit. A synthesis R&R often demands re-running the search, adding studies, or new bias/moderator analyses, so the response must satisfy every reviewer and the editor while keeping the meta-analysis internally consistent. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate results.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill psychbull-rebuttal --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Psychological-Bulletin-Skills/skills/psychbull-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# R&R Rebuttal (psychbull-rebuttal) A Psychological Bulletin **R&R** on a synthesis is distinctive: reviewer requests often touch the **search, eligibility, coding, model, or bias analyses** — any of which can ripple through every downstream estimate, table, and figure. The response letter must convert each reviewer and keep the editor confident **without breaking the synthesis's internal consistency** or its deposited package. ## When to trigger - An R&R decision arrived and you are planning the revision + response letter - A reviewer wants the search expanded, studies added, or eligibility changed - A reviewer requests a different model, more moderators, or more bias diagnostics - Reviewers disagree and you must reconcile their demands ## Strategy 1. **Read the editor's letter as the rubric.** The editor flags the decisive points; solve those first. 2. **One point-by-point response, every comment addressed.** Quote each comment, then respond; never skip one — silence reads as non-compliance. 3. **Propagate changes consistently.** If you **expand the search or change eligibility**, you must re-run **everything downstream** — pooled effect, heterogeneity, moderators, bias diagnosti

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Strategy
  3. Response-letter format
  4. Anti-patterns
  5. Worked vignette — propagating an R&R through the synthesis
  6. Reviewer pushback → response move (Bulletin-specific)
  7. Output format
  8. Supplementary resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the psychbull-rebuttal skill do?

Use when writing the response to a Psychological Bulletin revise-and-resubmit. A synthesis R&R often demands re-running the search, adding studies, or new bias/moderator analyses, so the response must satisfy every reviewer and the editor while keeping the meta-analysis internally consistent. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate results.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill psychbull-rebuttal --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going