Agent skill · Data & Analytics

psci-open-science-and-transparency

Use when meeting Psychological Science's open-science requirements. For submissions on or after 1 January 2024 the journal requires open data and materials (case-by-case exemptions), a Research Transparency Statement placed between the Introduction and Methods, persistent identifiers for shared content, and treats transparency limits and preregistration quality as factors in editorial decisions. Prepares compliance; it does not waive requirements.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill psci-open-science-and-transparency --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/psci-open-science-and-transparency/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Open Science & Transparency (psci-open-science-and-transparency) This is the skill that most distinguishes a Psychological Science submission. Since **1 January 2024** the journal has **required** open data and materials and a graded **Research Transparency Statement** — the badge era is over, and "**limits on transparency will be a factor in editorial decisions.**" Prepare this early, not at acceptance. ## When to trigger - Building the data/materials deposits and the Research Transparency Statement - Deciding whether (and how) to claim an exemption from sharing - Linking preregistration and reporting its status - A reviewer or editor flagged transparency or reproducibility ## What is required (verify current wording on the official page) 1. **Open data and materials.** Make data, analysis scripts, and study materials openly available, with **case-by-case exemptions** that must be **justified** (e.g., legal, ethical, or confidentiality constraints). It is a requirement, not a bonus. 2. **Research Transparency Statement.** A **required separate section placed between the Introduction and the Methods** for empirical manuscripts. It reports the availability of data, analysis script

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. What is required (verify current wording on the official page)
  3. Build-it-right checklist
  4. Exemptions (do them honestly)
  5. Research Transparency Statement — worked draft (illustrative)
  6. Transparency-readiness decision table
  7. Reviewer / editor pushback and the venue fix
  8. Anti-patterns
  9. Output format
  10. Supplementary resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the psci-open-science-and-transparency skill do?

Use when meeting Psychological Science's open-science requirements. For submissions on or after 1 January 2024 the journal requires open data and materials (case-by-case exemptions), a Research Transparency Statement placed between the Introduction and Methods, persistent identifiers for shared content, and treats transparency limits and preregistration quality as factors in editorial decisions. Prepares compliance; it does not waive requirements.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill psci-open-science-and-transparency --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going