ppw:reviewer-simulation
Simulate peer review of academic papers with structured feedback. Produces bilingual review report with scoring and actionable suggestions. Triggers on "review", "peer review", "simulate reviewer", "审稿", "模拟评审".
npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill ppw-reviewer-simulation --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
## Purpose This Skill simulates peer review of academic papers, producing a structured bilingual review report. It assesses the paper across five dimensions (Novelty, Methodology, Writing Quality, Presentation, Significance) with 1-10 scoring, identifies major and minor concerns with actionable three-part feedback (problem, why it matters, suggestion), and delivers a verdict recommendation. When a target journal is specified, journal-specific expectations are woven into review comments. The report follows real journal review conventions and includes inline Chinese translations for every concern and the verdict. ## Core Prompt > Source: [awesome-ai-research-writing](https://github.com/Leey21/awesome-ai-research-writing) — 论文整体以 Reviewer 视角进行审视 ````markdown # Role 你是一位以严苛、精准著称的资深学术审稿人，熟悉计算机科学领域顶级会议的评审标准。你的职责是作为守门员，确保只有在理论创新、实验严谨性和逻辑自洽性上均达到最高标准的研究才能被接收。 # Task 请深入阅读并分析我上传的【PDF论文文件】。基于我指定的【投稿目标】，撰写一份严厉但具有建设性的审稿报告。 # Constraints 1. 评审基调（严苛模式）： - 默认态度：请抱着拒稿的预设心态进行审查，除非论文的亮点足以说服你改变主意。 - 拒绝客套：省略所有无关痛痒的赞美，直接切入核心缺陷。你的目标是帮作者发现可能导致拒稿的致命伤，而不是让作者开心。 2. 审查维度： - 原创性：该工作是实质性的突破还是边际增量？如果是后者，直接指出。 - 严谨性：数学推导是否有跳跃？实验对比是否公平（Baseline 是否齐全）？消融实验是否充分支撑了核心主张？ - 一致性：引言中声称的贡献在实验部分是否真的得到了验证？ 3. 格式要求： - 严禁列表化滥
- Purpose
- Core Prompt
- Trigger
- Modes
- References
- Required (always loaded)
- Leaf Hints (loaded based on paper sections)
- Journal Template (conditional)
- Loading Rules
- Ask Strategy
- Workflow
- Step 0: Workflow Memory Check
- Step 1: Collect Context
- Step 2: Analyze Paper
What does the ppw:reviewer-simulation skill do?
Simulate peer review of academic papers with structured feedback. Produces bilingual review report with scoring and actionable suggestions. Triggers on "review", "peer review", "simulate reviewer", "审稿", "模拟评审".
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill ppw-reviewer-simulation --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From majiayu000/claude-skill-registry, a repository with 534 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.