ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility
Use when meeting open-science and reproducibility obligations for a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) piece — repository deposit for any original data, a documented and ideally preregistered systematic protocol for meta-science, and exemplary disclosure (PoPS is an open-science leader). Builds the transparency layer; it does not draft the synthesis (ppsych-organizing-framework) or run the submission preflight (ppsych-submission).
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Transparency & Reproducibility (ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility) ## When to trigger - The piece reports or reuses any original data and you must make it available - The piece is **meta-science** and its systematic coverage/coding must be reproducible - You are deciding what to preregister, deposit, and disclose for a field-shaping reform piece - You want the open-science layer to be drafted from live identifiers, not promised at acceptance ## Why this matters more at PoPS than almost anywhere PoPS is a **leading venue for the open-science and replication movement** — much of the meta-science that reshaped psychology's methods appeared here. The journal's readers and reviewers hold reform-adjacent work to its own standard: a piece arguing for transparency that is itself opaque loses all authority. The bar is **exemplary practice**, especially for the reform/meta-science pieces that are PoPS's signature. Build the transparency layer early so the statements are written from real DOIs and OSF links, not aspirations. ## What the obligation bites on (by piece type) | Piece type | Where transparency applies | |------------|---------------------------| | **Integrative review / th
- When to trigger
- Why this matters more at PoPS than almost anywhere
- What the obligation bites on (by piece type)
- PoPS / SAGE policy facts (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准 — re-confirm on the author pages)
- Building the reproducible meta-science protocol
- Checklist
- Anti-patterns
- Output format
What does the ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility skill do?
Use when meeting open-science and reproducibility obligations for a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) piece — repository deposit for any original data, a documented and ideally preregistered systematic protocol for meta-science, and exemplary disclosure (PoPS is an open-science leader). Builds the transparency layer; it does not draft the synthesis (ppsych-organizing-framework) or run the submission preflight (ppsych-submission).
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-transparency-and-reproducibility --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.