ppsych-editor-strategy
Use when working with the Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) editor and editorial team — proposal-stage scope, what review referees of a perspective evaluate, suggesting reviewers, and the author–editor relationship. Plans the interaction; it does not run the submission preflight (ppsych-submission) or draft the response letter (ppsych-revision).
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-editor-strategy --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Editor & Editorial Strategy (ppsych-editor-strategy) ## When to trigger - An editor reacted to a proposal and you are shaping scope before drafting - You want to anticipate what PoPS referees of a *perspective* will push on (different from a study) - You must suggest reviewers for submission and want to do it well - You are calibrating how the PoPS review cycle and the bimonthly schedule work ## Who you are working with at PoPS PoPS is published by **SAGE** in partnership with **APS**, with an **Editor-in-Chief** (Arturo Hernandez, University of Houston, since 2024-12-01；web-verified 2026-06-22；re-verify before relying) leading a board of associate/handling editors across psychology's areas (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). The relationship runs through the **handling editor** the EiC assigns. Because PoPS mixes submitted and invited/cooperative work, the dynamic varies by route: for a **stand-alone** piece you may pitch a proposal first (de-risks fit, not acceptance); for **cooperative** work (special issues, adversarial collaborations) the editor approves the *structure* before assembly. In all cases acceptance is **not** automatic — every manuscript, solicited or not, goes through the **sa
- When to trigger
- Who you are working with at PoPS
- How review differs for a perspective
- Suggesting reviewers (a controllable lever)
- Scope and relationship management
- Checklist
- Anti-patterns
- Output format
What does the ppsych-editor-strategy skill do?
Use when working with the Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) editor and editorial team — proposal-stage scope, what review referees of a perspective evaluate, suggesting reviewers, and the author–editor relationship. Plans the interaction; it does not run the submission preflight (ppsych-submission) or draft the response letter (ppsych-revision).
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-editor-strategy --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.