Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

popdevr-literature-positioning

Use when positioning a Population and Development Review (PDR, Wiley / Population Council) manuscript against the population-and-development literature so it reads as a broad-interest contribution. PDR readers span demography, economics, environment, and policy, so the paper must engage both the population-science conversation and the development debate it touches. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the lit review.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill popdevr-literature-positioning --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Population-and-Development-Review-Skills/skills/popdevr-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Literature Positioning (popdevr-literature-positioning) PDR editors screen for whether a paper speaks to the **relationships between population and social, economic, and environmental change** and to **policy** — and whether it will interest a readership wider than one sub-discipline. A paper that engages only a narrow applied literature, or only formal demography, reads as off-fit. The goal is to place the paper where **both population scientists and development/policy scholars** can see the gap and the move. ## When to trigger - Drafting or revising the introduction and the "contribution" paragraph - A reviewer said you "missed the development literature" or "this is just an applied estimate" - Your population analysis is solid but the paper does not connect to a development or policy debate - You need to distinguish your contribution from the closest prior population-and-development work ## How PDR wants the literature engaged 1. **Engage two conversations at once.** Identify the open question in **population science** (a contested trend, an unexplained gap, a measurement dispute) *and* the **development/policy** debate it bears on (growth, inequality, gender, climate, ageing

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. How PDR wants the literature engaged
  3. Cross-field engagement (a distinctive PDR demand)
  4. Anti-patterns
  5. Positioning pass for PDR
  6. Output format
  7. Supplementary resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the popdevr-literature-positioning skill do?

Use when positioning a Population and Development Review (PDR, Wiley / Population Council) manuscript against the population-and-development literature so it reads as a broad-interest contribution. PDR readers span demography, economics, environment, and policy, so the paper must engage both the population-science conversation and the development debate it touches. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the lit review.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill popdevr-literature-positioning --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going