Agent skill · Testing & QA

pnas-workflow

Use when deciding which pnas-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a manuscript from significance test through reviewer rebuttal for PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences). Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill pnas-workflow --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 8 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: PNAS-Skills/skills/pnas-workflow/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# PNAS Workflow Router (pnas-workflow) ## Overview This is the router. It does not replace any specialized skill. It tells you **which pnas-* skill to use at the current stage** of a manuscript aimed at *PNAS* (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences). PNAS publishes across three broad divisions — **Biological Sciences, Physical Sciences, and Social Sciences** — and every research article is filed under one of them plus a minor subject area (`pnas-writing`). Two things make PNAS unlike Science or Nature and reshape the workflow: the **submission track** decision (Direct vs Contributed by an NAS member — `pnas-track`) and the mandatory **Significance Statement** (`pnas-significance`). Settle the track early; it changes how the paper is handled and reviewed. ## When to trigger - "What should I do next with this draft?" - A draft arrives and you must diagnose the current bottleneck. - The user is unsure whether to use Direct or Contributed submission. - Reviews arrive from PNAS and you need to switch into rebuttal mode. ## The single most important gate PNAS is selective but **more accepting than Science or Nature**: it values solid, important science, not only the flashiest t

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Overview
  2. When to trigger
  3. The single most important gate
  4. Routing table
  5. Default order
  6. Decision shortcuts
  7. How PNAS differs from Science and Nature
  8. Manuscript-stage routing snapshot
  9. Anti-patterns
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the pnas-workflow skill do?

Use when deciding which pnas-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a manuscript from significance test through reviewer rebuttal for PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences). Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill pnas-workflow --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going