Agent skill · Workflow & Productivity

pldi-related-work

Use when positioning a PLDI paper against the SIGPLAN family and systems neighbors — stating technical deltas per cited line, covering the last few PLDI/POPL/OOPSLA/ICFP cycles, citing PACMPL-era papers in journal form, and verifying every venue attribution on dblp before it ships.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill pldi-related-work --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 4 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: PLDI-Skills/skills/pldi-related-work/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# PLDI Related Work At PLDI, related work is an adversarial exercise: your reviewers are frequently the authors of your closest baselines. The section must therefore do two things — prove you know the landscape's *mechanisms* (not just its citations), and state, line by line, what this paper does that each prior technique cannot. ## The delta discipline Ban survey sentences ("Much work has studied pointer analysis [3,7,12,19]"). Every citation earns its place with a mechanism and a delta: > Steensgaard-style unification [7] scales linearly but merges all callees' > effects; our signatures keep callee effects separate at equal asymptotic cost > (§4.3). If you cannot write the delta clause, you have not read the paper closely enough to cite it at PLDI — where the cited author may be reviewer B. ## Coverage map | Neighbor | What to check there | Typical relationship to a PLDI paper | |---|---|---| | PLDI, last ~4 cycles | The direct competition; reviewers expect these compared, not just cited | Baseline or head-to-head | | POPL | The semantic foundations your system builds on | "We implement/scale what [x] formalized" | | OOPSLA | Language design, empirical SE-flavored PL studies | Al

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. The delta discipline
  2. Coverage map
  3. Cite the PACMPL era correctly
  4. Verification before submission
  5. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the pldi-related-work skill do?

Use when positioning a PLDI paper against the SIGPLAN family and systems neighbors — stating technical deltas per cited line, covering the last few PLDI/POPL/OOPSLA/ICFP cycles, citing PACMPL-era papers in journal form, and verifying every venue attribution on dblp before it ships.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill pldi-related-work --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going