paper-review
Use when a paper is complete or near-complete and a holistic pre-submission audit is needed. Cross-cuts text, code, tables, figures, results, citations, and reproducibility in a single pass and produces a persistent audit report. Works standalone on papers written outside the plugin.
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill paper-review --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Paper Review ## Overview This skill runs a terminal, cross-cutting audit before submission. It is not a deep prose critic (that is `paper-writing`), not a statistical robustness reviewer (that is `robustness-checks`), not a reproducibility verifier (that is `replication-driven-research`). Instead, it detects the seams between those skills — numerical inconsistency across the manuscript, narrativ
What does the paper-review skill do?
Use when a paper is complete or near-complete and a holistic pre-submission audit is needed. Cross-cuts text, code, tables, figures, results, citations, and reproducibility in a single pass and produces a persistent audit report. Works standalone on papers written outside the plugin.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill paper-review --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills, a repository with 3,244 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.