Agent skill

panel-of-experts

Get the take of the specific experts a situation actually needs — a lawyer, a therapist, an accountant, a doctor-minded thinker, whoever fits — each in their own voice. Use when asked what would a [profession] say, get expert perspectives on this, who should I be thinking like here, or what am I missing that a pro would catch. Produces a panel of the right domain experts for your situation, each flagging what a layperson would miss, where they'd disagree, and what to verify with a real professional — never a substitute for licensed advice on serious matters.

mohitagw158561,255★ · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codecursorMIT
Install
npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill panel-of-experts --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 4 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: skills/panel-of-experts/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 1,277
Language: HTML

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Panel of Experts Every messy situation has several professionals who'd each catch something you'd miss — the legal angle, the money angle, the emotional angle, the health angle. This convenes the *right* experts for your specific situation, each speaking in their own frame, so you see the blind spots before they bite. It's a thinking aid, not a replacement for a real professional when the stakes are high. ## What This Skill Produces - **The right panel** — the specific expert lenses your situation needs (not generic five personas — chosen to fit) - **Each expert's take** — what a professional in that domain would notice, flag, or advise - **What a layperson misses** — the non-obvious thing each expert would catch that you wouldn't - **Where they disagree** — when the legal, financial, and human advice pull in different directions - **Verify-with-a-real-pro flags** — where the stakes mean you should actually consult a licensed professional ## Required Inputs Ask for these if not provided: - **The situation** — what you're dealing with - **What you're deciding or worried about** — the specific question - **The stakes** — how much rides on it (drives the verify flags) - **Any expert

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. What This Skill Produces
  2. Required Inputs
  3. Framework: Pick The Right Experts, Surface Blind Spots
  4. Output Format
  5. Situation: [what you're facing]
  6. Quality Checks
  7. Anti-Patterns
  8. Example Trigger Phrases
More from pm-claude-skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the panel-of-experts skill do?

Get the take of the specific experts a situation actually needs — a lawyer, a therapist, an accountant, a doctor-minded thinker, whoever fits — each in their own voice. Use when asked what would a [profession] say, get expert perspectives on this, who should I be thinking like here, or what am I missing that a pro would catch. Produces a panel of the right domain experts for your situation, each flagging what a layperson would miss, where they'd disagree, and what to verify with a real professional — never a substitute for licensed advice on serious matters.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill panel-of-experts --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills, a repository with 1,277 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going