Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

osdi-review-process

Use when reasoning about how an OSDI paper is reviewed and decided — the double-blind HotCRP PC pipeline with no author-response period, the two tracks, conditional acceptance with heavyweight shepherding, co-chair recusal, notification timing, and the Jay Lepreau Best Paper lineage.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill osdi-review-process --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 7 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: OSDI-Skills/skills/osdi-review-process/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# OSDI Review Process Model the pipeline the paper enters at the December deadline. The process facts below are the OSDI '26 cycle (verified 2026-07-08); OSDI re-decides its process per edition — '26 itself removed the response period — so read the current CFP's process section before predicting anything. ## The pipeline, author's-eye view ```text Dec 11 submission complete on HotCRP (osdi26.usenix.hotcrp.com) | double-blind PC review, typically multi-round: | early round -> low-scoring papers exit with fewer reviews | later round(s) -> surviving papers gather more reviews | online discussion + PC meeting | (no author-response step existed in the '26 cycle) Mar 26 notification: accept | conditional accept | reject | conditional: shepherd assigned, mandated-change list issued Jun 9 shepherd-approved final paper due (or the acceptance lapses) Jul 13 open-access proceedings live as the event opens ``` Round structure and reviewer counts are PC-internal and vary; what is stable is the consequence: **the first two or three pages decide whether the paper earns the later rounds**, because early-round reviewers triage a large pile (capped at eight submissions per author, but multiplied acr

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. The pipeline, author's-eye view
  2. What "no response period" changes about review
  3. Conditional acceptance and heavyweight shepherding
  4. Structural facts worth knowing
  5. Surviving the triage round
  6. Reading a rejection usefully
  7. Decoding the decision letter
  8. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the osdi-review-process skill do?

Use when reasoning about how an OSDI paper is reviewed and decided — the double-blind HotCRP PC pipeline with no author-response period, the two tracks, conditional acceptance with heavyweight shepherding, co-chair recusal, notification timing, and the Jay Lepreau Best Paper lineage.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill osdi-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going