Agent skill · AI & Agents

orgsci-contribution-framing

Use when drafting the mandatory <500-word contribution statement and the discussion section for an Organization Science manuscript — articulating the overall contribution to organization research from any of the journal's accepted sources, not novelty for its own sake. This is the single most decisive skill for desk-survival at this venue.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill orgsci-contribution-framing --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 4 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Organization-Science-Skills/skills/orgsci-contribution-framing/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Contribution Framing & the Contribution Statement (orgsci-contribution-framing) ## When to trigger - You are preparing to submit and need the mandatory contribution statement - A senior editor said "interesting, but the contribution is not clear" - Your discussion restates results without saying what organization research learns - You are defaulting to a "novelty" pitch and need a stronger frame ## The mandatory contribution statement (required since June 1, 2023) Organization Science requires a **contribution statement of under 500 words in the cover letter**, read by the **Editor-in-Chief and Senior Editor during desk review alongside the abstract** but **not** seen by reviewers. Submissions without it are returned for revision before editorial review, so treat it as a gating document. In under 500 words it must articulate, plainly, the **novel contribution to organization research**: what we did not understand about organizations before this paper, and now do. ## Frame around overall contribution, not novelty The editorial philosophy is explicit: **"theoretical novelty is neither necessary nor sufficient,"** and overall contribution outweighs novelty. Identify which **source(s

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. The mandatory contribution statement (required since June 1, 2023)
  3. Frame around overall contribution, not novelty
  4. Write the discussion to match
  5. Anti-patterns
  6. Contribution pass for Organization Science
  7. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the orgsci-contribution-framing skill do?

Use when drafting the mandatory <500-word contribution statement and the discussion section for an Organization Science manuscript — articulating the overall contribution to organization research from any of the journal's accepted sources, not novelty for its own sake. This is the single most decisive skill for desk-survival at this venue.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill orgsci-contribution-framing --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going