Agent skill

nw-rr-critique-dimensions

Critique dimensions and scoring for research document reviews

majiayu000github.com/majiayu000GitHub ↗
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill nw-rr-critique-dimensions --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 2
SKILL.md size: 4 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: skills/analysis/nw-rr-critique-dimensions/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 534
Language: HTML

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Critique Dimensions for Research Review Load when reviewing research documents. Apply each dimension systematically. ## Dimension 1: Source Selection Bias Check: contradictory viewpoints included? | Multiple organizations/authors/perspectives? | Geographic/temporal diversity? | Sources truly independent (not circular)? Flags: 60%+ from single org/author -> critical | All supporting same conclusion without counterpoint -> critical | Single geographic region -> medium | Clustered publication dates -> medium ## Dimension 2: Evidence Quality Check: every major claim cited | sources reputable (peer-reviewed, official, established) | primary over secondary | technical sources recent (5 years) | confidence matches evidence Flags: uncited claim -> high | blog/forum for factual claim -> high | all secondary sources -> medium | sources >5 years for tech -> medium | high confidence with 1-2 sources -> high ## Dimension 3: Replicability Check: search strategy documented | source selection criteria explicit | methodology transparent | confidence levels with rationale Flags: no methodology section -> high | vague methodology ("searched the web") -> medium | no confidence ratings -> medium ## D

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Dimension 1: Source Selection Bias
  2. Dimension 2: Evidence Quality
  3. Dimension 3: Replicability
  4. Dimension 4: Priority Validation
  5. Dimension 5: Completeness
  6. Review Output Template
Ships with 1 file
  • metadata.json
More from claude-skill-registry
All skills →
descriptive-statisticsSummarizing and visualizing data through measures of center, spread, shape, and position. Covers…Data & Analyticsperplexity-researcher-reasoning-proHighest level of research and reasoning capabilities for complex decision-making with significant…OtherretroBrutally honest engineering retrospective. Analyzes git history for what actually happened — not…Data & AnalyticsanalyzeUniversal multi-perspective analyzer for any topic, file, idea, or decision. Extract key points…Otherarize-prompt-optimizationINVOKE THIS SKILL when optimizing, improving, or debugging LLM prompts using production trace data…Data & Analyticscellxgene-contextGuide for integrating CellxGene Census single-cell data with ENCODE bulk experiments. Use when…Data & Analytics
About this skill
What does the nw-rr-critique-dimensions skill do?

Critique dimensions and scoring for research document reviews

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill nw-rr-critique-dimensions --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From majiayu000/claude-skill-registry, a repository with 534 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going
All skills →
The full catalog, by category and by tool.
Open Source Radar →
The repositories these skills come from, watched daily.
The people behind them →
Makers and builders across the ecosystem.