Agent skill · Design & Presentation

ngeo-results-framing

Use when a Nature Geoscience result is correct but its headline advance and cross-disciplinary significance are not yet sharp. Structures the one-advance narrative and the "Here we show" abstract; does not run analysis or design figures.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ngeo-results-framing --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Nature-Geoscience-Skills/skills/ngeo-results-framing/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Nature Geoscience Results Framing (ngeo-results-framing) ## When to trigger - You have the data/model output but the "so what for the Earth system" is fuzzy - The draft reads like a chronological expedition or model-run report, not a single argument - You have several findings and have not chosen the headline one - The opening buries the result under a literature or regional-setting tour - `ngeo-scope-fit` returned a Nature Geoscience verdict but flagged the breadth framing as weak ## The one-advance discipline A Nature Geoscience Article makes **one** headline advance. Everything else is support. Decide the headline result first; demote the rest to corroboration, to the online Methods, or to Supplementary Information. - **Primary advance** — the single sentence the title and abstract both encode, phrased as what the Earth system *does*, not what you *measured*. - **Supporting results** — at most two or three, and only if they reinforce the primary one. - **Everything else** — regional context, extended sensitivity tests, secondary proxies → SI (see `ngeo-supplementary`). If you have two co-equal advances, you likely have two papers, or one belongs in a community journal. ## The

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. The one-advance discipline
  3. The abstract: the "Here we show" convention
  4. The opening (first paragraphs carry the gate)
  5. Framing decision branches
  6. Checklist
  7. Anti-patterns
  8. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the ngeo-results-framing skill do?

Use when a Nature Geoscience result is correct but its headline advance and cross-disciplinary significance are not yet sharp. Structures the one-advance narrative and the "Here we show" abstract; does not run analysis or design figures.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ngeo-results-framing --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going