Agent skill · Data & Analytics

newms-data-analysis

Use when conducting and reporting the analysis of a New Media & Society (NM&S) manuscript across qualitative, content/discourse, computational, and mixed methods — making inference transparent and defensible on each tradition's own terms. Strengthens analysis and reporting; it does not collect data.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill newms-data-analysis --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: New-Media-and-Society-Skills/skills/newms-data-analysis/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Data & Analysis (newms-data-analysis) NM&S spans interpretive, content-analytic, and computational analysis under one interdisciplinary roof. The standard is the same across them: the analysis must be **transparent**, **credible to a reader from another tradition**, and matched to what the evidence can support. This skill is about *inference and reporting*, not study design (`newms-research-design`). ## When to trigger - Moving from collected data to claims, themes, measures, or results - A reviewer asked for reliability, robustness, validation, or a clearer analytic trail - You need to report uncertainty or limits honestly for a cross-method audience ## Qualitative inference (interviews / ethnography) - **Analytic transparency**: show the path from data to claim — coding/memoing process, how themes were built, and how many informants/instances support each theme (avoid "many participants felt…"). - **Negative cases and disconfirmation**: report instances that cut against the reading and how they were handled — the strongest signal of credible qualitative work. - **Quote-to-claim discipline**: each claim is anchored to specific evidence, not an isolated vivid quote. ## Content /

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Qualitative inference (interviews / ethnography)
  3. Content / discourse analysis
  4. Computational analysis
  5. Inference honesty (all methods)
  6. Robustness & reliability checklist by method
  7. Worked micro-example (illustrative)
  8. Referee pushback → NM&S-specific fix
  9. Calibration anchors
  10. Anti-patterns
  11. Output format
  12. Supplementary resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the newms-data-analysis skill do?

Use when conducting and reporting the analysis of a New Media & Society (NM&S) manuscript across qualitative, content/discourse, computational, and mixed methods — making inference transparent and defensible on each tradition's own terms. Strengthens analysis and reporting; it does not collect data.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill newms-data-analysis --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going