Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

nbr-workflow

Use when deciding which nbr-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from fit judgment through rebuttal for 《南开管理评论》 (Nankai Business Review). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills, and re-routes math-model or macro-policy papers to sibling journal stacks.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill nbr-workflow --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 3 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Nankai-Business-Review-Skills/skills/nbr-workflow/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# 《南开管理评论》工作流(nbr-workflow) ## 总览 这是路由器,不替代任何专用 skill。它告诉你**当前阶段该用哪个 nbr-* skill**。 默认假设:目标是工商管理学科高端平台《南开管理评论》(教育部主管、南开大学商学院主办)。核心评判是**理论贡献 + 中国情境 + 测量规范(问卷-SEM / 实验 / 多案例)**,而非因果识别的"干净"。基础事实见 `resources/journal-profile.md`。 ## 触发时机 - 用户问"这篇能不能投《南开管理评论》/ 下一步做什么" - 手头是构念间关系(中介/调节/被调节的中介)但讲不出理论缺口 - 不确定该投本刊、《管理世界》还是《管理科学学报》 - 收到 R&R 外审意见需要回复 ## 路由表 | 当前症状 | 下一个 Skill | |----------|-------------| | 不确定对不对口、可能是数理模型/宏观政策 | `nbr-fit-positioning` | | 有发现但讲不清理论缺口与贡献 | `nbr-theory-gap` | | 假设凭直觉、缺机理推演 | `nbr-hypothesis-development` | | 量表没信效度 / 没做共同方法偏差 | `nbr-measurement` | | 问卷数据,要跑中介/调节/多层 | `nbr-survey-sem` | | 用实验法,担心操纵/随机化/效应量 | `nbr-experiment` | | 质性多案例 / 扎根理论,编码与饱和不清 | `nbr-qualitative-case` | | 中国情境只是采样地、没进理论 | `nbr-china-context` | | 讨论部分没回扣理论、不知如何推进 | `nbr-discussion-contribution` | | 准备投稿,需要体例与系统 checklist | `nbr-submission` | | 收到 R&R,需要写回复 | `nbr-rebuttal` | ## 默认顺序 1. `nbr-fit-positioning` — 先判断对口,别把数理/政策稿硬投本刊 2. `nbr-theory-gap` — 立住理论缺口与贡献形态 3. `nbr-hypothesis-development` — 每条假设配机理 4. `nbr-measurement` — 信效度 + CMV(问卷类前置工程) 5. `nbr-survey-sem` / `nbr-experiment` / `nbr-qualitative-case` — 按方法三选一 6. `nbr-china-context` — 让情境进入理论 7. `nbr-discussion-contribution` — 讨论回扣并推进理论 8

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. 总览
  2. 触发时机
  3. 路由表
  4. 默认顺序
  5. 阶段闸门与产出物
  6. 路由走查示例
  7. 状态报告格式
  8. 决策口诀
  9. 与本仓库其它期刊包的差异(改投判断)
  10. 二手数据稿件的路由说明
  11. 反模式
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the nbr-workflow skill do?

Use when deciding which nbr-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from fit judgment through rebuttal for 《南开管理评论》 (Nankai Business Review). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills, and re-routes math-model or macro-policy papers to sibling journal stacks.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill nbr-workflow --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going