Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

nbr-china-context

Use to contextualize theory for 《南开管理评论》 (Nankai Business Review) — showing how the China context changes construct meanings, mechanisms, or boundary conditions, rather than using China merely as a sampling site. Use when the China context appears only in the sample description, or when the paper asserts "Chinese characteristics" without specifying how the context alters the theory.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill nbr-china-context --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 2 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Nankai-Business-Review-Skills/skills/nbr-china-context/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# 中国情境化(nbr-china-context) ## 触发时机 - 中国情境只出现在"样本来自中国某省 N 家企业" - 文中常说"中国情境下",但说不清情境**改变了什么** - 直接套用西方理论,未问其前提在中国是否成立 ## 核心标准:情境进入理论,而非作背景 情境化要回答**情境如何改变理论**,三条路径任选其一: 1. **改变构念含义**:同一构念在中国情境下内涵/外延不同(如"关系""面子""家长式领导") 2. **改变机制**:X→Y 的中介路径或强度因情境(制度、文化、市场发育)而变 3. **改变边界条件**:某理论的适用范围在中国情境下被收窄/扩展/反转 ## 把情境做成调节而非标签 - 用**可测的情境变量**(制度环境、市场化程度、文化价值观、所有制、数字化水平)作为调节或对比维度 - 让情境进入**假设与模型**,而不是只在引言/讨论喊口号 - 与既有(含西方主流)理论**平等对话**:继承什么、修正什么、何处因情境而不同 ## 两个极端都要避免 - **全盘套用**:把中国当西方理论的"又一个样本",无情境贡献 - **过度特殊化**:只讲"国情特殊"、拒绝任何一般化,导致无法对话、不可累积 ## 情境化深度分级(先自评再动笔) | 层级 | 形态 | 本刊接受度 | |------|------|-----------| | L0 | 中国只是采样地,正文论证与情境无关 | 低——常被审稿人点名"换个国家也成立" | | L1 | 情境变量只作控制变量或稳健性分组 | 偏低——情境仍在理论之外 | | L2 | 情境以可测调节变量进入假设与模型 | 合格起点 | | L3 | 情境重塑构念内涵或机制本身(情境化理论建构) | 最具竞争力,呼应本刊"中国管理实践理论化"取向 | 判定口诀:把稿中"中国"全部替换成"某新兴市场",若论证毫发无损,说明仍停在 L0–L1,需返工。 ## 微型走查:差序氛围与员工建言 设想一篇稿件:用西方建言(voice)理论解释中国制造企业员工为何沉默,发现心理安全感的作用弱于既有文献预期。 - L1 写法:加一个"所有制"控制变量——情境未进入理论,预期被拒 - L2 改法:引入**差序氛围**作可测调节变量,提出假设:差序氛围强时,心理安全感→建言的路径被削弱;测量用本土差序氛围量表(衔接 nbr-measurement) - L3 改法:论证"建言"在差序情境下分化为"对内圈进言 / 对外圈沉默"两种形态,重构构念维度并提出新命题——这是本刊最欢迎的情境化贡献 ## 评审追问与应对 | 评审追问 | 修复动作 | |----------|----------| | "换成其它新兴市场是否同样成立?" | 指明机制依赖的**制度/文化要素**(如差序格局、关系治理),并说明其在何类社会可

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. 触发时机
  2. 核心标准:情境进入理论,而非作背景
  3. 把情境做成调节而非标签
  4. 两个极端都要避免
  5. 情境化深度分级(先自评再动笔)
  6. 微型走查:差序氛围与员工建言
  7. 评审追问与应对
  8. 自检清单
  9. 反模式
  10. 已刊文章的情境化呈现(校准锚)
  11. 输出格式
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the nbr-china-context skill do?

Use to contextualize theory for 《南开管理评论》 (Nankai Business Review) — showing how the China context changes construct meanings, mechanisms, or boundary conditions, rather than using China merely as a sampling site. Use when the China context appears only in the sample description, or when the paper asserts "Chinese characteristics" without specifying how the context alters the theory.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill nbr-china-context --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going