navan-reference-architecture
Use when designing a production Navan API integration architecture \u2014\ \ API gateway, token management, data sync pipelines, ERP connectors, and monitoring\ \ stack.\nTrigger with \"navan reference architecture\" or \"navan integration architecture\"\ .\n"
npx skills add jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill navan-reference-architecture --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Navan Reference Architecture ## Overview Production-grade architecture for Navan API integrations. Navan provides raw REST endpoints with OAuth 2.0 — no SDK, no webhooks, no sandbox. This architecture handles those constraints with five purpose-built layers. ## Prerequisites - Navan API credentials from Admin > Travel admin > Settings > Integrations - Cloud infrastructure (AWS, GCP, or Azure) fo
What does the navan-reference-architecture skill do?
Use when designing a production Navan API integration architecture \u2014\ \ API gateway, token management, data sync pipelines, ERP connectors, and monitoring\ \ stack.\nTrigger with \"navan reference architecture\" or \"navan integration architecture\"\ .\n"
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill navan-reference-architecture --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills, a repository with 2,596 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.
